On a previous post, we established that Florida was the third leading state for international travel to the United States  according to the Office of Travel and Tourism Industries (OTTI). In fact, Florida was only 50,000 international visitors behind California in 2008 for the second spot. With California’s budgetary woes and most certain forthcoming state park closings, Florida will surpass California for the lucrative international travel tourism market.

On the table is a plan to close 220 of 279 California state parks effecting some 80 million domestic and international visitors. This would include such icons as Big Sur and the Redwoods State Park. This is all in an attempt to close the state budgetary shortfall for roughly $400 million spent on the parks system. More than likely, California will end up passing higher user fees to theoretically close the gap, but this will most likely have a net negative overall economic impact on the state.

Luckily Florida tourism vis-a-vis the state park system does not face these same challenges. The problem California has is that it’s magnificent parks are an implicit part of many international traveler itineraries. Closing or dramatically raising park fees will have a spillover effect on overall international travel volume and further lower state revenues. In fact, many economists calculate a positive 2 to 1 benefit to cost multiplier ratio for California state revenues.

Although Florida tourism is down, travel to Disney and other parts of Florida are still highly viable. As value to the average international traveler increases via discounted tickets, increased attractions statewide and improved international air service, Florida will most certainly surpass California for total international travel volume. Rather than reducing attractions and park services that lure visitors and bring in tax revenues, California should follow Florida’s lead.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!